Group presentation analysis 4/28

Group 1: Spencer, Melissa, Thai
Altered State of Legality
Some of the positives for this group was that they had good eye contact and strong clear voices when presenting. The negatives, however, were that I felt that while the slides were moving, it felt that they were moving too rushed, and that they couldv'e analyzed the charts more and explained on them. I didn't really have questions for their group.

Group 2: Dana, Thor, Ben, and JB
Show me the Money
Some of the positives for this group were that they were clear about what they were talking about and how they presented the info; Dana, Ben, and JB all knew their material well which was obvious by how confident they were; and Dana was super calm throughout the whole thing. The only negative I could find was that Thor should've done some more quick review about the topic so that he would have been more confident. The only question I had was that if NCAA athletes were to be paid, would a 5th string guy be paid the same as a starting lineup player, or no?

Group 3: Matt, Jose, Brett
Fast Food in America
The positives for this group were that they had a fun and interesting delivery of info , they were enthusiastic, and that their presentation involved interacting with the audience. The negatives were that they had intentional cussing, and they were a lot over the time limit. I didn't really have a question for this group.